Koinos

Indian Arbitration Blog

Skip to content
  • Home
  • Essays
  • Arbitration Materials
  • Drafting Table
  • Guest Post Guidelines
  • External Publications
  • Contact us
Search

BGS Soma

Seat v Venue of Arbitration: A Quest for Clarity (Part II)

December 8, 2020 / Ritvik M. Kulkarni / Leave a comment

This guest post is authored by Disha Lohiya. She is currently studying in the third year at National Law University, Jodhpur. Seat v Venue of Arbitration: A Quest for Clarity (Part II) In the first part of this post, the author delved into the meaning and scope of the terms seat, place, and venue of … Continue reading Seat v Venue of Arbitration: A Quest for Clarity (Part II)

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 112 other subscribers

Explore

Editors

  • Ananya Krishnan
  • Kavya Arora
  • Ritvik M. Kulkarni
Donate to IDIA

Extend your support to India's legal leaders of tomorrow.

Archives

  • December 2022 (1)
  • August 2022 (1)
  • June 2022 (1)
  • May 2022 (1)
  • March 2022 (1)
  • December 2021 (1)
  • October 2021 (1)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (3)
  • July 2021 (2)
  • June 2021 (3)
  • May 2021 (4)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (3)
  • February 2021 (1)
  • January 2021 (1)
  • December 2020 (2)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • July 2020 (3)
  • June 2020 (2)
  • May 2020 (6)
  • April 2020 (1)
  • March 2020 (2)
  • February 2020 (3)
  • January 2020 (1)
  • November 2019 (3)
  • August 2019 (1)
  • May 2019 (1)
  • March 2019 (1)
  • January 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (5)
  • November 2018 (2)
  • October 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)

Editors

  • Ananya Krishnan
  • Kavya Arora
  • Ritvik M. Kulkarni

Recent Posts

  • Discussing the Validity of Pre-conditions for Invocation of Arbitration
  • Does an Extension Agreement Need a Specific Arbitration Clause?
  • Mitra Guha Builders Co. vs. ONGC Ltd: Examining the scope of Arbitrators in Excepted Matters
  • Enforcing Emergency Awards in India in the Foreign Seated Arbitrations: Winning a Half-Won Battle
  • Haryana Tourism Ltd. v. M/s Kandhari Beverages Ltd: Analysis on High Court’s power under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act

Tags

2015 Arbitration Amendment 2019 Arbitration Amendments ADR Agami Arbitrability Arbitral Award Arbitration arbitration judgments 2018 arbitration review Arbitration Roundup Arbitrator Appointment Bombay High Court Calcutta High Court Chloro Controls Civil Procedure Code Coastal Marine v Gareware-Wall Ropes Competence Competence Condonation of Delay Conflict of Interest court fees Delhi High Court Discharge of Contract Duro Fulgeura emergency award enforcement of award Events foreign award Fraud Guest Post ILS Law College Pune india Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Insufficiently Stamped Agreement Insurance Agreements Interest Interim Relief international arbitration investment arbitration Jobs Kerala High Court limitation Mediation NAFED Negotiation Skills Opportunity Oral Arbitration Agreement Order II RUle 2 PACT Patent Illegality Perkins Eastman Post-award Section 9 Public policy Recall of Order Res-judicata SAMA SBP Patel Engineering Seat Section 8 Section 9 Section 11 Section 11(6) Section 11(6A) Section 12(5) Section 14 Limitation Section 16 Section 17 Section 33 Stamp Act Section 34 Section 48 singapore Singapore Convention SMS Tea v Chandamari Tea Supreme Court TRF v Energo Venue

General Disclaimer

Views expressed on this blog are strictly personal and attributable solely to the author(s).

Website Powered by WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Koinos
    • Join 112 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Koinos
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar